Interface Lab
DESIGN STUDY / FOUR DIRECTIONS

WP-IL-008 / PROTOTYPE GALLERY — 4 CONCEPTS, 1 LAB

One laboratory.
Four first impressions.

Four independently accessible landing-page directions share the same research corpus but offer different compositions and visitor experiences. These are prototypes to compare, not final or validated winners.

Tip: switch quickly using the bottom dock, or Alt+←→ and Alt+A–D.

A / 04 · Narrative & credibilityOpen concept Editorial ResearchResearch told as a clear narrative.Large typography, generous spacing, and evidence-led explanations.Low — readingFirst-time readers seeking contextHypothesis: An editorial structure and one featured finding may help first-time readers assess the lab’s credibility.Visit A — Editorial ResearchB / 04 · Direct experienceOpen concept Living ExperimentAn experiment as the first experience.High contrast, an interactive stage, and a focus on measurement.High — try firstVisitors who prefer learning by doingHypothesis: Trying a demo immediately may clarify what makes this lab distinctive.Visit B — Living ExperimentC / 04 · Method & traceabilityOpen concept Research ChainFrom sources to findings.Step-by-step diagrams, evidence trails, and relational navigation.Medium — explore nodesReaders who want to inspect the methodHypothesis: A traceable research chain may help visitors understand the method.Visit C — Research ChainD / 04 · Orientation + evidenceOpen concept Clear Shell + Living ProofClarity with one interactive example.Compact composition, focused artifact, and goal-based exploration.Medium — one focused illustrationNew visitors (hypothesis)Hypothesis: A familiar structure with one featured experiment may balance orientation and curiosity.Visit D — Clear Shell + Living Proof

Compare at a glance

Use this table after exploring at least two concepts. Do not decide based only on first impressions.

AspectA · Editorial Research ↗B · Living Experiment ↗C · Research Chain ↗D · Clear Shell + Living Proof ↗
Primary focusNarrative & credibilityDirect experienceMethod & traceabilityOrientation + evidence
First interactionLow — readingHigh — try firstMedium — explore nodesMedium — one focused illustration
First evidenceOne featured finding examined in depthAn interactive stage in the heroClickable five-stage research chainOne focal illustration with goal-based paths
Intended audienceFirst-time readers seeking contextVisitors who prefer learning by doingReaders who want to inspect the methodNew visitors (hypothesis)
HypothesisAn editorial structure and one featured finding may help first-time readers assess the lab’s credibility.Trying a demo immediately may clarify what makes this lab distinctive.A traceable research chain may help visitors understand the method.A familiar structure with one featured experiment may balance orientation and curiosity.

How to compare

Try the same three tasks on every page: (1) explain Interface Lab in one sentence, (2) find an experiment and run it, (3) trace a claim back to its source. Record task time and confusion, not just visual preferences.

  • First impression: is the lab's purpose immediately clear?
  • Orientation: can you return to the gallery or flagship easily?
  • Evidence: are limitations visible alongside claims?
  • Access: test keyboard use, 200% zoom, and a 320 px screen.

Main homepage (flagship) tersedia di /, separately from these four prototypes. Prototype pages are not search-indexed, and no participant study has been completed. Use the bottom dock or the Landing Pages menu to switch without scrolling to the top.